ENGINEERING BACKGROUND · CAREER DIRECTION

From fluid mechanics to deployable Physics-AI systems

I am an engineer with a foundation in engineering physics and fluid mechanics, more than a decade of CFD and thermal-fluid experience, and a growing focus on turning simulation, reduced-order modeling and AI into usable engineering products and decision tools.

Engineering PhysicsFluid MechanicsCFD / Thermal-FluidsCross-functional EngineeringPhysics-AI
THE THROUGH-LINE

Technical depth first, then broader engineering ownership

My career started from numerical simulation: understanding flow physics, building CFD models, interpreting results and connecting them to engineering decisions. Over time, the scope expanded from simulation itself toward coordination across disciplines, equipment and system integration, safety, suppliers, software, infrastructure and project delivery.

The current direction combines those two sides: retain enough physical and numerical depth to judge a model critically, while building systems that are easier to deploy, communicate and use across engineering teams.

FOUNDATION

Physics, simulation and engineering computation

EDUCATION

Engineering Physics → Fluid Mechanics

A BSc in Engineering Physics followed by an MSc in Fluid Mechanics established the combination of mathematics, numerical methods, continuum physics and engineering interpretation that still anchors my work.

CORE SPECIALISM

CFD & thermal-fluid simulation

Roughly a decade of CFD work has covered external aerodynamics, thermodynamics and thermal management, as well as energy and other industrial fluid-flow applications.

ENGINEERING CONTEXT

Automotive, energy and industrial systems

Projects have included vehicle aerodynamics and thermal management, gas-turbine and thermal-storage topics, and simulation work outside automotive where fluid mechanics supports product or equipment development.

CAREER EVOLUTION

From specialist simulation work to cross-functional engineering

01
CFD ENGINEERING

Model the physics

Build numerical models, assess convergence and fidelity, extract aerodynamic / thermal insight and translate simulation into engineering recommendations.

02
MULTI-SECTOR APPLICATION

Apply the method beyond one product

Work across automotive and energy problems, adapting the same fluid-mechanics foundation to different geometries, operating conditions and design questions.

03
CROSS-FUNCTIONAL ENGINEERING

Own more of the system

Current work extends into equipment planning and project coordination: integrating production, maintenance, safety, fire protection, suppliers, infrastructure, controls and installation constraints around real industrial equipment.

04
PHYSICS-AI DIRECTION

Connect models to deployable capability

The next step is to combine simulation, reduced-order modeling, AI and practical software deployment so high-fidelity engineering knowledge becomes faster to explore and easier for others to use.

WHY THIS PORTFOLIO

The project is deliberately broader than “train an AI model on CFD”

01 · PHYSICS

Start from defensible simulation

OpenFOAM/CFD remains the source of truth. Mesh, numerics, convergence, field definitions and validation matter before model compression begins.

02 · REPRESENTATION

Understand the dynamics before choosing the model

Raw POD, phase/residual decomposition, SPOD and SINDy are compared because different flow structures demand different reduced descriptions.

03 · AI / ROM

Use learning where it creates leverage

The objective is fast reconstruction, interpolation and eventually broader generalization—not claiming that AI has replaced the CFD solver or the underlying physics.

04 · PRODUCTIZATION

Make engineering models usable

Cloud workflows, reproducible datasets, APIs, browser visualization and lightweight deployment are part of the technical problem, not an afterthought.

CAREER VISION

Bridge simulation expertise, AI and engineering leadership

I am interested in roles where deep technical understanding and wider ownership meet: leading simulation/AI projects, shaping engineering products, coordinating technical teams, or working directly with customers and stakeholders around complex physics-based technology.

The long-term goal is not to remain confined to one solver, one model family or one industry. It is to build the capability to identify the engineering problem, choose the right fidelity, organize the data and computation, evaluate the model honestly, and turn the result into something that can influence real decisions.

Physics credibilityKnow what the model means and where it can fail.
AI leverageUse data-driven methods to reduce time-to-insight.
Systems thinkingConnect simulation to infrastructure, workflow and deployment.
LeadershipTranslate between specialists, decision-makers and users.
CURRENT PROOF POINT

NACA0012 is the first complete case study

The current project is intentionally modest in geometry but broad in workflow. It demonstrates how I want to work: preserve CFD provenance, compare modeling hypotheses rather than hide failures, develop real-time reconstruction, and carry the result through to an interactive web application.