CASE STUDY · FLUID–BODY COUPLING

Flapping wing: from actuation to aerodynamic response

How does a flapping wing interact with initially still air? This two-dimensional OpenFOAM experiment follows an OWL05 airfoil through prescribed torso-relative heaving, dynamically controlled pitch, and the resulting aerodynamic loads. A simplified torso is free to translate under those loads and gravity.

2D incompressible flow8 HzOWL05 airfoilFree X/Y translation
01 · WING MOTION

One cycle of the actual simulated motion

The vertical stroke is prescribed relative to the torso: a faster 35% downstroke and slower 65% upstroke. The pitch controller follows a set target, but actual pitch responds dynamically to fluid loads and the limited joint torque. This lightweight demonstration replays the recorded motion from t = 1.000–1.125 s of this simulation.

RECORDED OWL05 WING · TORSO-RELATIVE VIEW
Upper reversal: +1 cLower reversal: −1 c Torso reference Heave: +1.00 c Pitch: −90.0° Torso drift omitted for clarity
RELATIVE HEAVE (CHORDS)
PITCH ANGLE (DEGREES)
Actual pitch Controller target

Playback is the only variable control; flapping frequency, stroke proportions, heaving and pitching motion are fixed. The speed slider covers 0.01×–1× with logarithmic spacing for finer adjustment at slow speeds. 1× replays physical time (8 cycles per second). This is a recorded one-cycle example, not a CFD recomputation.

02 · AERODYNAMIC RESPONSE

Velocity field, force components and pitching moment

The finished simulation movie represents ten seconds of simulated physical time in 100 seconds of playback. The left panel follows the translating torso while showing velocity magnitude in the inertial laboratory frame. Its World X/Y coordinate ticks move as the torso travels. The three plots on the right track Fx, Fy and Mz within a moving two-second time window.

World-coordinate axes tracking the torso · corrected inertial-frame interpolation from the original 5,000 CFD snapshots. Optimized 30 fps web video; original high-resolution movie remains archived separately.

The unsteady wake

Vortices generated during one stroke remain in the flow and influence subsequent aerodynamic loading. This coupling makes instantaneous forces dependent on the evolving wake, not merely the wing’s current angle.

Interpreting loads

Fx and Fy are aerodynamic components in the world frame. Mz is aerodynamic moment about the moving pivot. Force oscillations alone do not establish stable hovering or free-flight control.

03 · NUMERICAL IMPLEMENTATION

The CFD stays wing-fixed; the simulated body can move

The computational mesh does not physically translate or deform each timestep. The CFD solution uses a wing-attached non-inertial frame, with acceleration and rotation terms and transformed far-field conditions. A coupling loop converts aerodynamic loads into body-motion updates.

01 · Relative motionImpose heave h(t)
Schedule pitch target θ*(t)
02 · Joint responseFinite pitch torque
Actual θ(t) evolves
03 · CFDWing-fixed flow field
Pressure / viscous loads
04 · Body dynamicsWorld-frame forces + gravity
Free torso X/Y translation

The staggered coupling repeats every timestep. In the wing frame, the momentum equation includes moving-origin, Coriolis, angular-acceleration and centrifugal terms. The torso’s attitude remains fixed: this is not a free 6-DOF bird.

SectionOWL05 · 0.142 m chord
Actuation8 Hz, ±1 chord relative heave, 35/65 stroke
Mass0.30 kg total; 0.03 kg effective wing mass
Fluid2D laminar incompressible; initially still air
Span interpretation0.426 m (three chords)
IntegrationAdaptive timestep ≤ 0.0001 s
04 · LIMITATIONS & DIRECTION

What this run demonstrates—and what remains open

Demonstrated

Coupled unsteady aerodynamics, dynamically controlled wing pitch, prescribed relative heave and recorded torso translation within a reproducible OpenFOAM/Python workflow.

To investigate

Force spikes and timestep sensitivity, numerical validation, 2D-to-3D limitations, sustained-flight stability and future free-attitude control. Results are not experimental proof of hovering.

Future extensions may include a three-dimensional wing, improved flight control and data-driven reduced-order models for faster motion studies.

← Back to SimFoundry